Labor Law

Print
Article
What's the Harm? The Future of the First Amendment
Must Free Speech be Harmful?
Leslie Kendrick
Vice Dean and David H. Ibbeken ‘71 Research Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of Law.

I would like to thank Amy Adler, Will Baude, Danielle Citron, Genevieve Lakier, Fred Schauer, Elizabeth Sepper, and the participants in The University of Chicago Legal Forum’s 2019 Symposium for their helpful comments. This piece builds upon the analysis of rights and harm I offered in Leslie Kendrick, Free Speech as a Special Right, 45 Phil. & Pub. Aff. 87 (2017).

Popular discourse in the United States often assumes that it must. Discussions about hate speech or false speech frame harm as the price we pay for freedom.

Print
Article
What's the Harm? The Future of the First Amendment
The Shifting Law of Sexual Speech: Rethinking Robert Mapplethorpe
Amy Adler
Emily Kempin Professor of Law, NYU School of Law.

I would like to thank the University of Chicago Legal Forum for hosting me at the 2019 Symposium: “What’s the Harm? The Future of the First Amendment” where I presented an earlier draft of this paper. I’m also grateful to the New Museum of Contemporary Art for hosting me to speak on the anniversary of the Mapplethorpe trial at its event “‘Robert Mapplethorpe: The Perfect Moment,’ Twenty-Five Years Later” and to Kevin Moore and Fotofocus for curating the event. I am grateful for the insights of the other speakers at the event: Johanna Burton, Keith Haring Director and Curator of Education and Public Engagement at the New Museum; Jennifer Blessing, Senior Curator of Photography, Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York; Paul Martineau, Associate Curator, Department of Photographs, the J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles; and Britt Salvesen, Curator and Head of the Wallis Annenberg Photography Department and the Prints and Drawings Department, the Los Angeles County Museum of Art. Many thanks to Lillian Barany, Katherine Nemeth, and Jeffrey Waldron for superb research assistance and to Cynthia Adler as always for her comments.

Print
Article
What's the Harm? The Future of the First Amendment
Discrimination, the Speech That Enables It, and the First Amendment
Helen Norton
Rothgerber Chair in Constitutional Law and Professor of Law, University of Colorado School of Law.

Thanks to Bethany Reece, Jessica Reed-Baum, Virginia Sargent, and Jonathan Smith for outstanding research, and to the University of Chicago Legal Forum for excellent editorial assistance. Thanks too for thoughtful comments from Rachel Arnow-Richman, Rebecca Aviel, Amal Bass, Alan Chen, Terry Fromson, Beto Juarez, Margot Kaminski, Margaret Kwoka, Vicki Schultz, Nantiya Ruan, Derigan Silver, Scott Skinner-Thompson, Catherine Smith, and the par-ticipants at the Colloquium on Scholarship on Employment and Labor Law at Texas A&M School of Law, the Free Expression Scholars Conference at Yale Law School, and the symposium on What’s the Harm? The Future of the First Amendment, at the University of Chicago Law School.

Imagine that you’re interviewing for your dream job, only to be asked by the hiring committee whether you’re pregnant. Or HIV-positive. Or Muslim. Does the First Amendment protect your interviewers’ inquiries from government regulation? This Article explores that question.

Print
Comment
What's the Harm? The Future of the First Amendment
"Segs and the City" and Cutting-Edge Aesthetic Experiences: Resolving the Circuit Split on Tour Guides' Licensing Requirements and the First Amendment
Marie J. Plecha
B.A. Dartmouth College; J.D. Candidate, The University of Chicago Law School.

Tourism represents an important contributor to state and local economies. Accordingly, some U.S. cities have sought to regulate operations of the industry, including the activities of official tour guides.

Print
Comment
Law for the Next Pandemic
Striking a New Grand Bargain: Workers' Compensation as a Pandemic Social Safety Net
Dylan V. Moore
B.S., Indiana University, 2019; J.D. Candidate, The University of Chicago Law School, 2022.

I would like to extend my thanks to the current and past members of The University of Chicago Legal Forum for thoughtful edits on this piece. All errors are my own.

As COVID-19 continues to disrupt the workplace, legal analysts struggle to predict how infected laborers’ claims will fare in workers’ compensation systems. Workers’ compensation systems vary across states, but their purpose is the same—to give employees who are injured through the everyday completion of their jobs access to sure-fire compensation.