International Law

Print
Article
Reimagining National Security
Addressing IP and Technology Challenges to Pandemic Protection: A Need for Global Coordination to Promote National Security
Cynthia M. Ho
Clifford E. Vickrey Research Professor of Law and Director of the Intellectual Property program at the Loyola University of Chicago School of Law.

This Article argues that effective national security mandates protection against the spread of infectious diseases, which requires addressing intellectual property (IP) and technology obstacles. Without modification, IP laws can bar the manufacture of needed treatments by anyone besides the IP owner and its licensees. This Article explains how usual IP norms can frustrate public health and national security, why current proposals for a pandemic agreement are largely inadequate, as well as what countries can and should do to protect national security even if there is not adequate consensus for binding obligations in an international pandemic agreement.

Print
Article
Reimagining National Security
A Transformational Agenda for National Security
Maryam Jamshidi
Associate Professor of Law at the University of Colorado Law School.

Many thanks to Pratheepan Gulasekaram, Aziz Rana, and Wadie Said, as well as participants in The University of Chicago Legal Forum Symposium on Reimagining National Security and the University of Iowa College of Law’s Faculty Speaker Series, for helpful feedback on this piece. Many thanks as well to the editors of The University of Chicago Legal Forum, especially Saloni Jaiswal, for insightful suggestions and careful editing of this Article. All errors are my own.

Past efforts to “reimagine” national security in legal scholarship have largely avoided systematic engagement with the foundational assumptions and presumptions of the field. Challenging and critiquing those assumptions is, however, necessary to producing scholarly work that reimagines, rather than reproduces, status quo approaches to U.S. national security. This Article presents an agenda for reimagining national security through legal scholarship, which is premised on the view that challenging the national security status quo should be part of those efforts. In doing so, this agenda explores seven premises central to how U.S. national security is currently conceived of, practiced, and implemented. Moving beyond the law, the agenda presented in this Article examines the structural power dynamics and political economy of national security, demonstrating why these issues are important to reimagining and transforming how we approach the discipline of national security as legal academics and advocates.

Print
Article
Reimagining National Security
Cultural Heritage and Security Policy
Morag M. Kersel
Associate Professor, Department of Anthropology, DePaul University.
Patty Gerstenblith
Professor, DePaul University College of Law.

I want to thank Cat Mossing (DePaul Law ‘25) and Makayla Reynolds (DePaul Law ‘25) for their research assistance.

National security and cultural heritage protection are connected in several ways. This Article explores how the real or perceived relationship between threatened cultural heritage and national security developed, how this relationship has changed U.S. foreign and cultural policy, and whether these changes are for the better or the worse from a broader policy perspective, particularly with respect to the goal of cultural heritage preservation.