Family Law

Print
Comment
Law for the Next Pandemic
Protecting Mixed-Status Families: Equal Protection Analysis of the Dual Social Security Number Requirement
Nena Gallegos
B.S., American University, 2019; J.D. Candidate, The University of Chicago Law School, 2022.

Many thanks to Professor Aziz Huq for his invaluable guidance and thoughtful feedback. I would also like to thank the past and present editors of The University of Chicago Legal Forum for their insightful contributions.

This Comment analyzes the equal protection issues raised by the Dual SSN Requirement and argues that it violates the equal protection rights of citizen children and spouses.

Print
Comment
The Body
Fixing the Powerhouse of the Cell: Challenging the FDA's Prohibition of Mitochondrial Replacement Therapy
Kendall Bryant
B.S., Florida State University, 2019; J.D. Candidate, The University of Chicago Law School, 2023.

I would like to thank Professor Emily Buss and the former and current staff of the Legal Forum for their thoughtful feedback and guidance on this piece. I am also grateful for the support from my friends and family along the way.

Many women long to be mothers one day. Motherhood can take different forms; it can be adopting children, birthing biological children, or nurturing a stepchild, to name a few options. Some women who want biologically related children run a high risk of their children being born with an incurable disease, endangering their chance for biological children to lead healthy lives.

Print
Article
The Body
Borrowed Wombs: On Uterus Transplants and the "Right to Experience Pregnancy"
Glenn Cohen
Deputy Dean and James A. Attwood and Leslie Williams Professor of Law, Harvard Law School. Faculty Director, Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology & Bioethics.

I thank Vrushab Gowda and Jessica Cianci for excellent research assistance pertinent to this article. I thank Alex Chen, participants at the University of Miami’s Legal Theory Workshop, and participants in the Forum’s symposium for their comments.

In December of 2017, the first birth from a uterus transplant in America occurred in Dallas, Texas. This article's focus is to compare uterus transplants to other ways to achieve parenthood, to evaluate what kinds of rights claims those who seek to use uterus transplants are making against the state and offer some tentative thoughts on how those claims should be treated.

Print
Article
The Body
Donorsexuality After Dobbs
Mary Anne Case
Arnold I. Shure Professor of Law at The University of Chicago Law School.

A version of this paper will appear in Enticements, edited by Joseph Fischel and Brenda Cossman, forthcoming NYU Press 2023. Versions have also been presented in Kim Krawiec’s podcast Taboo Trades, Michele Goodwin’s 2022 Baby Markets, and a University of Chicago Law School Faculty workshop, as well as at the Legal Forum’s 2021 Symposium on The Body.  I am grateful to participants in these events as well as to Susan Appleton, Erez Aloni, Will Baude, Brian Bix, June Carbone, Jessica Clarke, Caroline Mala Corbin, Bridget Crawford, Elyse Dayton, Liz Emens, Chip Lupu, Julia Mahoney, Sara McDougall, Ali Miller, Darren Rosenblum, Zalman Rothschild, Elizabeth Scott, Sonia Starr, Glenn Wallach, Tobias Barrington Wolff, and Ezra Young for brainstorming assistance and comments on drafts; as well as to Elizabeth Aiken, Franchesca Alamo, Alvin Cheung, Elena Prieto, and particularly Malavika Parthasarathy for research assistance.

For the better part of a century, the United States Supreme Court has issued a series of decisions, “the underlying premise of [which is] that the Constitution protects ‘the right of the individual . . . to be free from unwarranted governmental intrusion into . . .